Apr 14, 2010

Jane Jacobs

Jane Jacobs is my favorite Planner from the Past. There are a lot of things to write, but this article summarizes well her principles & her background (which I previously did not know). The key things that she advocated for were economic and social diversity & mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods. The part of the article that describes this is at the end, so if you aren't a subscriber you probably can't read it.. so I'm gonna copy paste it... Don't tell.

Jacobs' Background:
"She was born Jane Butzner in Scranton, Pennsylvania, in 1916, and came to New York City in 1934 with a high school diploma, some secretarial skills and a surplus of ambition. Like so many seekers before and since, she soon found the Village and settled there. Over the next decade Jacobs launched a freelance writing career. The assignments she took on for Vogue and other magazines and newspapers--profiles of the flower market, the garment industry, the diamond trade--introduced her to the various niche economies she would later define as the heart of city life. During the war and just after it she worked for the State Department, penning articles about American life for overseas distribution. In 1944 she met a young architect, Robert Jacobs. They married and in 1947 bought a fixer-upper--an old storefront building with an upstairs two-story apartment--at 555 Hudson Street in the West Village. Aided by her husband and several assignments for the State Department, Jacobs began to nurture an interest in architecture and city planning. By 1952 she had landed an editorial position with Architectural Forum, where she found herself in the belly of the beast: the magazine was the country's leading advocate of the austere towers and open plazas that epitomized the midcentury Modernist style in architecture and planning.

Up until this point, Jacobs had few convictions about city planning. This began to change when she visited Philadelphia, where she found head planner Edmund Bacon more concerned with maintaining order and "view corridors" than with sustaining neighborhood life. Not long after, she met William Kirk, the head worker at Union Settlement Association in East Harlem. He and his colleagues had begun to question the impact of the public housing going up in the neighborhood they served. The new tower complexes were uprooting old neighborhoods, scattering community life, deepening racial segregation and spoiling a lively streetscape. Flint notes that Jacobs was influenced by Kirk but overlooks how she joined forces with Kirk and his colleagues, which helped them to develop and express a new vision for urban planning, one that would not only inform Jacobs's thinking as she refined her views but also propel the gathering revolt against urban renewal and Modernist planning. East Harlem is proof of the much larger current of dissent into which Jacobs was stepping. Flint, however, focuses on Jacobs rather than the larger movement.
Back at Architectural Forum, Jacobs became something of a black sheep. She began to question openly the blind faith so many of her colleagues placed in Modernist planning principles. In 1958 she won a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation that allowed her to take a leave of absence to begin work on a book. Here, Flint's story narrows to its point: the familiar Jacobs-Moses cage match. The feisty and outspoken Jacobs, set on a "collision course" with Moses, publishes Death and Life and then proceeds to defeat the "master builder" in a decade-long contest for the soul of New York City. Having changed how everyone thinks about cities, Jacobs then pulls up stakes and moves to Canada, fed up with urban renewal and the threat the Vietnam War and the draft posed for her teenage sons."
 Jacob's Work:
"At the heart of this story are the three efforts Jacobs joined or led in the years between 1958 and 1968. The first was a protest against Moses's campaign--the latest of several attempts over the years--to run a road through Washington Square Park. Jacobs signed up to stop the roadway, helping a local committee to foil Moses's plans for good. Then, in early 1961, just after she finished writing Death and Life, she discovered that the city was planning to launch an urban renewal plan for her neighborhood. She played a key role in founding and leading the Committee to Save the West Village, the organization that convinced Mayor Robert Wagner that he'd be better off abandoning the project. Finally, there was perhaps the best known and hardest fought of Jacobs's campaigns, the effort to stop one of Moses's most fervent dreams: the Lower Manhattan Expressway. Lomex, as everyone called it, was to be an eight-lane elevated highway that would cross the island in an east-west direction over Broome Street, cutting through an industrial neighborhood just south of the Village. The bout lasted six years, winding its way through several different postponements and a few variations on the original plan to a now legendary climax: a 1968 public meeting in which Jacobs exhorted her allies to destroy the record of the hearing, thereby voiding the meeting. "Listen to this! There is no record!" she reportedly shouted into the microphone. "There is no hearing! We're through with this phony, fink hearing!" Not long after that, the highway project was abandoned and Jacobs's reputation sealed."
Related Books:
Wrestling with Moses: How Jane Jacobs Took On New York's Master Builder and Transformed the American City by Anthony Flint
The Death and Life of American Cities by Jane Jacobs
Cities and the Wealth of Nations by Jane Jacobs
The Power Broker (about Robert Moses) by Robert A. Caro
Selling the Lower East Side: Culture, Real Estate, and Resistance in New York City by Christopher Mele

Apr 7, 2010

Cal's [In]City

Cal's [In]City looks really interesting for all the future planners out there.
Do you have a strong interest in cities, the environment, and social change? Are you considering a graduate degree in urban planning, policy, or design? If so, our six-week Summer Program in Sustainable Cities, sponsored by the Department of City & Regional Planning at UC Berkeley, may change your life. [IN]CITY aims to expose students to how city and regional planners are planning more sustainable cities and regions. The program will help connect you to top faculty and professionals as well as build your portfolio for your graduate school application.

The program seems like a great stepping stone and way to discern if you are truly meant to be a planner. Plus, as a Cal alum, I know any program that comes out of the College of Environmental Design will be amazing! : )

Link to the description, with application instructions (due April 10, 2010).
They're also hosting similiar programs in architecture & landscape architecture.

Diaspora

One interesting force that affects cities is the people who live in them! (Duh!) A particular type of this force that is of interest to me is the diaspora of various ethnic groups.

In this article, Moazzam Begg, a former Guantanamo prisoner, is described as a British born Muslim who is ethnically Indian.
In Enemy Combatant, written with Victoria Brittain after his release from Guantánamo, Begg relates how trips to Mecca and Pakistan, the 1991 Gulf War and the arrival in Britain of Bosnian refugees made him see his faith as the way to unify his disparate identities; Islam became his imagined community.
We in the United States tend to forget that the U.S. is not the only country that is home to many diasporas (diasporae?) - Canada, Brasil, Mexico, France, the UK all contain many modern immigrant communities. Anyway, when there are various forces of racial and cultural friction, cities definitely feel the effects both socially and physically. Think about the food in your city or the gathering places in your city - they are often remnants of or current places of immigrant communities. Many immigrant communities physically aggregate, finding support and familiarity in similarly immigrated families. In terms of logistics, enclaves also make sense - ethnic markets, language schools. It happened a long time ago (Jewish in the Lower East Side in NYC) & it still happens though in different ways (Koreans in La Canada Flintridge) It even continues to happen when ethnic groups are no longer immigrant (Japanese Americans in the South Bay - Torrance, Gardena). Social translates very strongly into the physical architecture of a city.

But what that quote reminded me strongly of was that sometimes the city imagined is just as powerful as the reality of the city. Seems like Begg's identification with this imagined community was powerful enough to drive him to open a bookshop, which "became a local center of Britain's Islamic revival." This imagined community became a physical reality, a basis of a physical community.

Mar 17, 2010

Land Use Planning

Image: Larchmont Village in Los Angeles, CA - an example of mixed-use. Source.

As you know, cities, towns, counties, etc. are all made up of land. All land is used for various things. Some land is used as peoples' homes - this is a residential use. Some land has businesses on it - this is commercial land. On some land, there are factories and manufacturing - this is industrial land. And on and on. Typical categories of land use include residential, commercial, industrial, open space (parks), and civic (government buildings, schools, libraries). There is also a land use called "mixed-use," which means that there are multiple kinds of uses for the land. Usually mixed-use means you can have residential and commercial on the same land. When you see a store with apartments on top (more common in big cities than small towns), that's an example of mixed-use. See photo above.

Cities and counties usually decide how land will be used ahead of time - this is land use planning.You can find land use maps of your city, and there will be different colors overlaid on the map. Each color represents a different land use. For example, green will be open space.

Land use planning is not just about saying what land use goes where. Land use planning also says how much can be built. This is density, or how crowded it can get. A dense place is very crowded, like Manhattan in New York city. A low-density place has only a few people living in a big area.  Controlling density is important because it affects other parts of the city. If you have a very dense place, you're going to need to figure out how people and goods get there. If you have a very low-density place, you won't need as many schools.

One tool used in land use planning is zoning. Zoning is just what it sounds like - you divide up land according to zones, or land uses.  Zoning is complicated, and a lot of cities have very intricate zoning codes. Zoning is complicated because there are zones for each land use, and zones for each sub-category of each land use. More on zoning later, but it also can help land use planner dictate density, which adds another layer of complexity to zoning codes. You might see these kinds of zoning: multifamily residential, single-family residential, high density commercial.  See how density and land use are combined, imagine how many combinations of zones there might be.

Some cities do not have this planned out, like Houston, TX. Houston is maybe the only big city that doesn't have a zoning code. (But it does regulate land use in other ways.)

Land use planning is important because a lot of uses can't be put next to each other. For example, it would probably not be a good idea to allow factories to be built near schools.

You might be wondering why land use planning is still important, especially since most cities are already built. Land use planning is still relevant bc sometimes land uses evolve and need to be updated. Maybe you used to disallow residential areas near your downtown area, but maybe you want to revisit that. Maybe you want to change the zoning to allow mixed-uses, so people can turn the empty upstairs offices into apartments. Land use drives the way the city grows and looks, so planners update land use maps every so often accordingly.

My 2¢: I really liked learning about land use planning when I was in school, bc it's one of the forces that really affect the vibrancy of cities. There's a very direct connection. When there are mixed-uses, cities tend to be safe and lively, with lots of people around. When residential areas are separated from places that people work and play (suburbia), it sucks! Mixed-use good, segregating uses bad.

Planning Defined: Sub-Areas

Urban Planning = the planning of urban areas

That was easy. Now I can stop blogging. Not. Since I have yet to have come up with a compact and effective description of what exactly Urban Planning is, I will attempt to define it by demonstrating what it is. Good luck to me.

One reason Urban Planning is so difficult to explain is that it encompasses a wide range of sub-areas, as follows.
  • Land Use Planning
  • Physical Planning / Urban Design
  • Community Economic Development
  • Transportation / Infrastructure Planning
  • Environmental Planning

Other Planning topic areas, not exactly "urban:"
  • Rural Planning
  • International Development
  • Regional Planning
I'll explain each of these in upcoming posts.